Territorial Due Diligence —

Brazil ·

Guyana ·

Suriname

Territorial Intelligence for South American Mineral Assets

The constraint you don't map becomes the risk you can't price.

Imageo reads the regulatory, land tenure and geological constraints on Brazilian, Guyanese and Surinamese mineral assets — mapped the way TSX/TSXV, ASX, AIM or the NYSE expect them read under NI 43-101, JORC, PERC or S-K 1300, built on Azura™, our proprietary territorial intelligence engine, before a Qualified Person or Competent Person has to find out the hard way.

View jurisdictions Request a diagnostic

Jurisdictions covered

Azura™ constraint dimensions

Reporting standards — NI 43-101, JORC, PERC, S-K 1300

Languages — English, Portuguese, Dutch

Projects by jurisdiction

Three regulatory regimes. One methodology.

Each jurisdiction is treated as its own legal and geological dossier — not a regional footnote.

ANM / DNPM

Brazil

Amazônia Legal · Minas Gerais

ANM/SIGMINE tenure crossed against FUNAI indigenous territory boundaries and hydrography — built for teams reporting to TSX/TSXV, ASX, AIM or the NYSE.

Amazônia Legal — regionalActive

Minas Gerais — REEActive

See more on Investors →

GGMC

Guyana

Mining Act 1989

GGMC licence status checked against Amerindian Act titled land, plus EPA Permit staging — built for teams reporting to TSX/TSXV, ASX, AIM or the NYSE.

Guiana ShieldEstablishing

See more on Investors →

GMD

Suriname

Mijnbouwdecreet E-58

GMD concession status under Mijnbouwdecreet E-58, aligned to NIMOS environmental review — built for teams reporting to TSX/TSXV, ASX, AIM or the NYSE.

Guiana ShieldEstablishing

See more on Investors →

Methodology

The Azura Engine™

A proprietary Python/GeoPandas overlay engine — 13 constraint dimensions crossed against tenement polygons, weighted into a single risk map investors can act on.

Azura™ Analysis — Mining Rights Territorial Pressure

Azura Engine™ — 13 Territorial Analysis Dimensions

01 · Land Tenure Regularity Informational 83.7%

02 · Environmental Compliance Conditional 61.4%

03 · Geological Coherence Informational 91.2%

04 · Structural Control Informational 87.9%

05 · Geotechnical Risk Conditional 54.6%

06 · Geophysical Analysis Informational 94.3%

07 · Remote Sensing Informational 89.1%

08 · Hydrographic Network Restrictive 37.8%

09 · Social Impact Not Overlapping —

10 · Access & Infrastructure Informational 78.5%

11 · Protected Heritage Not Disclosed 100%

12 · Territorial Restriction Restrictive 42.3%

13 · Process Synergy Informational 76.9%

Territorial Readiness Score

12 dimensions computed · 1 non-overlapping excluded · 1 critical gap

68.4 / 100

MODERATE — VIABLE WITH CONDITIONS

Informational

Conditional

Restrictive

Blocking

Not Overlapping

Not Disclosed

01 Technical briefing — project, jurisdiction, exchange, and deliverable scope

02 Data acquisition & automated overlay via the Azura Engine™

03 Legal-territorial analysis — constraint interpretation & risk classification

04 Report & risk maps — investor-ready deliverable in EN, PT, or NL

05 Ongoing support — regulatory monitoring post-delivery

Swipe to see all 5 steps

Territorial Roadmap

A staged plan for resolving each flagged constraint — sequenced, owned, and timed, so the tenement's risk profile improves ahead of the next disclosure milestone.

Asset Scorecard

A comparable score across every project in the pipeline — so capital allocation decisions between jurisdictions rest on the same territorial baseline.

Learn More About the Azura Engine™

Want to see Azura working?