Solutions

The full research pipeline, priced for a VP and documented for a QP.

Azura™ isn't a standalone product — it's the filter that runs underneath every stage below, from a 48-hour screening to PFS/PEA support, so a CFO sees where capital is actually going and a QP or CP can defend every number in the report.

VPs & CEOs scoping budget
CFOs tracking spend by stage
QPs / CPs tracing every deliverable to source
Sample output · Azura Engine™ · Assessment Preview
01 · Land Tenure RegularityInformative83.7%
02 · Environmental ComplianceConditional61.4%
08 · Hydrographic NetworkRestrictive37.8%
+ 10 additional dimensionsIn the TFD—
Partial Score · 3 of 13 dimensions
Delivered in 48 hours
71.2 / 100
Illustrative sample output
01
Assessment Preview
48-hour screen · 3 of 13 dimensions
02
Territorial Feasibility Diagnostic
Full 13-dimension score + roadmap
03
Mineral Research P0 → P+
Remote sensing, geophysics, drilling, petrography
04
Specialized Services
Jurisdictional advisory, sworn translation
05
Capital Markets
Data structuring, QA/QC for QP/CP sign-off
Swipe left to see all 5 phases
Feasibility Fundamentals

From first look to full diagnosis.

Two complementary products that establish whether your project has legs before a single dollar goes to the field.

Entry Point · Phase 0
Assessment Preview
Azura Engine™ · 3 layers · Response in 48h

A fast, structured screening of your tenement via the Azura Engine™ — analysis across the 3 essential territorial dimensions, an immediate viability score, and actionable recommendations for go/no-go decisions.

Executive report in EN or PT (PDF)
Viability score 0–100 per tenement
Analysis of 3 Azura™ dimensions
Next-step recommendation
Turnaround: up to 48 business hours after briefing
Sample output · Azura Engine™ · Assessment
01 · Land Tenure RegularityInformative83.7%
02 · Environmental ComplianceConditional61.4%
03 · Geological CoherenceInformative91.2%
04 · Structural Control🔒 In the TFD—
05 · Geotechnical Risk🔒 In the TFD—
06 · Geophysical Analysis🔒 In the TFD—
07 · Remote Sensing🔒 In the TFD—
08 · Hydrographic Network🔒 In the TFD—
09 · Social Impact🔒 In the TFD—
10 · Access & Infrastructure🔒 In the TFD—
11 · Protected Heritage🔒 In the TFD—
12 · Territorial Restriction🔒 In the TFD—
13 · Process Synergy🔒 In the TFD—
10 of 13 dimensions locked at this stage Unlock in the TFD →
Partial Score · 3 of 13 dimensions
Full Territorial Readiness Score available in the TFD
71.2 / 100
⬤ Favourable across analysed dimensions
Azura Engine™ No field work Risk Score
Full Diagnosis · Phase 1
Territorial Feasibility Diagnostic
TFD · Azura Engine™ · 13 full layers

In-depth technical analysis via the Azura Engine™ across all 13 territorial dimensions — legal-territorial survey, registry verification, environmental, land tenure, and heritage overlaps. Includes a Territorial Roadmap and Asset Scorecard, and a full technical report compatible with international disclosure standards.

Full technical report (EN · PT)
Territorial Readiness Score — 13 dimensions
Territorial Roadmap — staged action plan
Asset Scorecard — comparable across portfolio
Georeferenced technical map (shapefile)
Compatible with NI 43-101 · JORC · PERC
Azura Engine™ — 13 Territorial Analysis Dimensions
01 · Land Tenure RegularityInformative83.7%
02 · Environmental ComplianceConditional61.4%
03 · Geological CoherenceInformative91.2%
04 · Structural ControlInformative87.9%
05 · Geotechnical RiskConditional54.6%
06 · Geophysical AnalysisInformative94.3%
07 · Remote SensingInformative89.1%
08 · Hydrographic NetworkRestrictive37.8%
09 · Social ImpactNot Coincident—
10 · Access & InfrastructureInformative78.5%
11 · Protected HeritageNot Disclosed100%
12 · Territorial RestrictionRestrictive42.3%
13 · Process SynergyInformative76.9%
Territorial Readiness Score
12 dimensions computed · 1 not coincident excluded · 1 critical gap
68.4 / 100
⬤ MODERATE — viable with conditions
Informative
Conditional
Restrictive
Not Coincident
Not Disclosed
NI 43-101 JORC 2012 PERC SK-1300
Territorial Strategy

Territorial Roadmap.

The action plan that turns a diagnostic into sequenced decisions — from assessment to production phase, with timeline, risks, and priorities mapped.

Sample timeline · 12-Month Roadmap
TFD · Diagnostic
2 wks
Classification
1 wk
Per-tenement plan
3 wks
Registry execution
4 mo
Mineral Research F1
3 mo
Monitoring
Ongoing
Final report
1 wk
Timeline adjusted to portfolio complexity. Simple projects: 30–60 days.
The Territorial Roadmap is not requested on its own — it comes bundled with the TFD deliverable, alongside the full report and the Territorial Readiness Score.
01
Starting-Point Diagnostic
Review of an existing TFD or accelerated execution. Mapping of the tenement portfolio and its current registry status.
02
Classification & Prioritization
Ranking by Territorial Readiness Score. Identification of priority tenements, critical constraints, and windows of opportunity.
03
Per-Tenement Action Plan
Timeline of regulatory, land tenure, and environmental actions per tenement — who does it, when, and what it unblocks.
04
Portfolio Strategy
Consolidation, disposal, or expansion recommendations. Territorial modeling of synergies between adjacent tenements.
05
Deliverable + Monitoring
Executive report with territorial Gantt. Optional continuous quarterly monitoring of registry changes.
Swipe left to see the full roadmap
Mineral Research

One pipeline, filtered by Azura™, across three jurisdictions.

Every phase — from grassroots (P0) to PEA/PFS (P+) — pairs a specific remote sensing, geophysical, drilling, or petrographic method with the Azura™ territorial diagnostic, so the technical work and the disclosure work move together. The same pipeline runs under ANM/DNPM in Brazil, GMD in Suriname, and GGMC in Guyana.

ANM / DNPM — Brazil GMD — Suriname GGMC — Guyana

Each phase below is color-coded cold to hot — blue for the least-proven, earliest-stage work, red for the most mature, most defensible position — as a visual shorthand for how much ground truth actually backs the asset at that point.

Background: Carajás Province, Pará (CPRM/SGB) — lithology with unit contacts, tectonic lineaments, mineral occurrences by substance, roads, water bodies, Indigenous Lands and Conservation Units
Mineral Research · Phase P0
01

Grassroots

Every project starts here — before a single image is ordered or a field crew mobilised, the Azura Engine™ reads the tenement and scores whether it is worth pursuing further.

Azura™ Territorial Screen Territorial Readiness Score Public Data Review
Azura™ preliminary territorial screen — 13 dimensions, entry read
Public geoscience & regulatory data review
Go / no-go viability score
Recommendation for the next research phase
Constraint Layers · Phase 01
01
Land Tenure Regularity
ANM / GGMC / GMD registry status
03
Geological Coherence
Lithology & metallogenic continuity
07
Remote Sensing Signature
Spectral alteration indicators
Mineral Research · Phase P1
02

Early Exploration

Once Azura clears a target, remote sensing sharpens it — satellite and drone imagery narrow down exactly where field work should start.

Multispectral VNIR/SWIR/TIR Hyperspectral Imaging SAR / LiDAR
Multispectral VNIR/SWIR/TIR imagery — orbital, lithology & alteration
Hyperspectral imaging — drone-based mineral alteration mapping
Structural lineament mapping (SAR-derived) and canopy-penetrating LiDAR terrain models
Target prioritization for ground sampling
Constraint Layers · Phase 02
06
Geophysical Signature
Indirect evidence supporting the target
07
Remote Sensing Signature
Hyperspectral alteration mapping
10
Access & Infrastructure
Cost of moving crews and samples out
Mineral Research · Phase P2
03

Resource Definition

Geophysics turns a prioritized target into a testable one — ground surveys reveal what sits beneath the surface before the first hole is drilled, with the technique matched to the deposit type and the terrain, including closed-canopy forest where airborne surveys lose resolution.

Ground Geophysics Magnetics & IP/ERT Closed-Canopy Surveys
Magnetics and gamma spectrometry — banded iron, VMS, and basement structure
IP/ERT and EM surveys — disseminated sulphides and porphyry/VMS-style targets
Ground-based line-cutting protocol for closed-canopy Amazon and Guiana Shield terrain
Geophysical anomaly correlation with Azura™ layers and drill-target definition
Constraint Layers · Phase 03
02
Environmental Compliance
Permitting status vs. drill program
05
Geotechnical Risk
Slope & drill-pad stability
08
Hydrographic Network
Water access for drill operations
Mineral Research · Phase P3
04

Resource Expansion

Drilling turns geophysical anomalies into assay data — core recovery and QA/QC build the database behind the first reportable resource.

Core Drilling Sample QA/QC Drilling Database
Core drilling & systematic sampling
Drilling database & QA/QC protocol
Inferred → Indicated resource upgrade
NI 43-101 / JORC progress report
Constraint Layers · Phase 04
04
Structural Control
SAR-mapped faults & shear zones
05
Geotechnical Risk
InSAR deformation monitoring
13
Neighbouring Tenure Conflict
Overlap as the footprint expands
Mineral Research · Phase P+
05

Advanced Research

By this stage the territorial constraints were already identified and resolved upfront by the TFD — this phase is where 3D modeling, geophysics, and drilling converge into a measured resource, and the advanced reporting that grows the asset and stabilizes its standing with the market.

3D Geological Modeling PEA / PFS Advanced Reporting
3D geological modeling — geophysics + drilling integration
Petrographic QA/QC on drill core
Measured resource estimation — declared
Advanced study support — Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) and Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS)
Constraint Layers · Phase 05
09
Social Impact
Community agreements documented for disclosure
11
Protected Heritage
Sites cleared for study-grade reporting
12
Territorial Restriction
Final veto check before PFS/PEA sign-off
Specialized Services

Beyond the diagnostic: full coverage.

Complementary solutions for every stage of the mineral chain — from technical consultancy to sworn translation.

Mineral Consultancy

Technical advisory from a specialist geologist in GIS and mineral regulation. Support for investor decks, third-party due diligence, and regulator responses.

Hourly Project Retainer
International Technical Reports

Production of technical sections and full reports compatible with NI 43-101, JORC 2012, SK-1300, and PERC. Deliverables ready for disclosure on TSX, ASX, and AIM.

NI 43-101 JORC 2012 PERC SK-1300
Geological Field Survey

Economic geology fieldwork — geological mapping, structural observation, and systematic sampling for deposit assessment, executed to standards auditable by a Qualified Person.

Geological Mapping Sampling Deposit Assessment
Jurisdictional Advisory — Brazil and the Guiana Shield

Ongoing tenement management across all three territorial jurisdictions — ANM applications, renewals, transfers, and amendments in Brazil; GGMC (Guyana) and GMD (Suriname) regulatory mapping and rights analysis — with continuous registry monitoring and bilingual EN/NL documentation.

ANM · Brazil GGMC · Guyana GMD · Suriname EN / NL
Mineral Database

Structuring, validation, and management of mineral databases — drilling, sampling, geophysics, and field data integrated on a GIS platform ready for modeling.

GIS · PostGIS Drilling QA/QC
Sworn Translation — PT / EN / NL

Certified sworn translation of technical and corporate documents between Portuguese, English, and Dutch — tenement titles, technical reports, and disclosure documents accepted for official and cross-border filing.

PT ⇄ EN PT ⇄ NL EN ⇄ NL
Contact the Team →
Capital Markets

Mineral assets, market-ready.

Territorial data structured and standardized for positioning tenements as investable assets on listed exchanges.

Data Structuring
Mineral Asset Standardization

Territorial and geological data organized to the standard your listing venue expects — ready to be cited directly in a QP/CP technical report.

CRIRSCO SAMREC SME
Quality Assurance
Auditable Documentation

Sample and drilling QA/QC, GIS integration (QGIS · ArcGIS · PostGIS), and export to modeling software — every step documented for QP/CP sign-off.

QA/QC QGIS · ArcGIS Auditable
Solution Comparison

Which solution is yours?

Swipe left to compare all solutions
Solution Turnaround EN Report NI 43-101 / JORC Fieldwork Best for
Assessment Preview Up to 48h ✓ Partial No Fast entry decision
Territorial Feasibility Diagnostic 5–15 days ✓ ✓ No Pre-board, M&A due diligence
Territorial Roadmap 2–4 weeks ✓ ✓ No Portfolio planning
Mineral Research F1 4–8 weeks ✓ ✓ Optional Grassroots exploration
Mineral Research F2 / F3 3–6 months ✓ ✓ ✓ Inferred / indicated resources
International Report (QP/CP) 3–8 weeks ✓ ✓ If needed TSX · ASX · AIM listing
Jurisdictional Advisory Ongoing On request ✓ No Brazil · Guyana · Suriname portfolio
Mineral Database 2–6 weeks ✓ ✓ Field data Audit · modeling · listing
Sworn Translation 2–5 days ✓ N/A No Cross-border filing
Standards & Frameworks
NI 43-101 JORC 2012 PERC SK-1300
Mining Code · Brazil Mining Act 1989 · Guyana Mijnbouwdecreet E-58 · Suriname
CRIRSCO SAMREC SME
In Practice

What a territorial reading actually catches.

Illustrative, composite scenarios built from patterns Azura Engine™ readings surface repeatedly across Brazil, Guyana and Suriname — not disclosures of any named client or project.

Brazil flagBrazil — Pará
Ahead of NI 43-101 filing
Situation
A TSXV-listed junior preparing a Technical Report believed its tenement boundary was clean based on its own SIGMINE export.
What Azura found
The Land Tenure layer flagged a boundary mismatch against ANM's current digital record — a Restrictive finding invisible in the client's own export.
Outcome
Resolved before filing. The QP incorporated the finding directly, avoiding a post-filing amendment and the scrutiny that comes with one.
Guyana flagGuyana
Pre-acquisition diligence
Situation
An ASX-listed company was evaluating an exploration licence acquisition adjacent to Amerindian titled land.
What Azura found
A ~340m discrepancy between the titled-land boundary and GGMC's cadastral polygon — an Impeditive reading pending resolution, the kind that can sink a deal at signature.
Outcome
Acquisition terms were renegotiated around a reduced footprint. The deal proceeded — on terms the buyer could actually defend to its board.
Suriname flagSuriname
Ahead of resource update
Situation
A mid-tier producer was expanding its permitted footprint ahead of a JORC-compliant resource update.
What Azura found
The Permitting Status layer showed one environmental permit segment had lapsed — a Conditional finding, with a clear mitigation path already on file with GMD.
Outcome
Permit renewed within 60 days. The resource update proceeded on schedule, with the gap documented rather than discovered mid-process.
Next Step

Does your project have real potential?

Request the Assessment Preview — no commitment, within 48 business hours. Or speak directly with the geologist.

Explore the Azura Engine™ → See Projects by Phase →